Please give some feed back on my poll, for example, the issue is no longer relevant or the polling was not set up will.
Progressive is always better, but it also requires more bandwidth, so people used interlaced video.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Progressive is always better, but it also requires more bandwidth, so people used interlaced video.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
You are absolutely right about the bandwidth. The reason behind my poll is that three professional have made the remark, that interlace produce a much better image. I wonted to see a consensus that this is a true statement.
I have a suspicion that the television manufacturers pushed 'progress' as being better, just to bump up sales. The whole conversion over to 'progress' started when Blu-ray came out.
There are also some talk about 24 yielding better pictures but I though throwing that in would just muddy what I am trying to do.
The whole thing could be mute because it is next to impossible to find a television or monitor that supports 'interlace'.
I would like to start a post on "TrueMotion" but I think that might be pushing this forum in a wrong direction.
Hm. I don't know too much on the technicals, but companies are definitely pushing progressive. Either is fine for me; if there's a quality difference, it's negligible.
And I think any 1080p HDTV can display interlaced footage.
Comments
Please give some feed back on my poll, for example, the issue is no longer relevant or the polling was not set up will.
Progressive is always better, but it also requires more bandwidth, so people used interlaced video.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
You are absolutely right about the bandwidth. The reason behind my poll is that three professional have made the remark, that interlace produce a much better image. I wonted to see a consensus that this is a true statement.
I have a suspicion that the television manufacturers pushed 'progress' as being better, just to bump up sales. The whole conversion over to 'progress' started when Blu-ray came out.
There are also some talk about 24 yielding better pictures but I though throwing that in would just muddy what I am trying to do.
The whole thing could be mute because it is next to impossible to find a television or monitor that supports 'interlace'.
I would like to start a post on "TrueMotion" but I think that might be pushing this forum in a wrong direction.
Hm. I don't know too much on the technicals, but companies are definitely pushing progressive. Either is fine for me; if there's a quality difference, it's negligible.
And I think any 1080p HDTV can display interlaced footage.
Also, why not, these forums are slow.